RoSE: A Robotic Soft Esophagus for Endoprosthetic Stent Testing

2026-08-10Robotics

Robotics
AI summary

The authors created a soft robotic model of the esophagus called RoSE to test how different stents used to treat swallowing problems behave. They tested two stents with different stiffness to see how much force they exert on the esophagus wall and how this affects stent movement and swallowing. They found that stiffer stents prevent movement better but might reduce swallowing efficiency if they buckle. Their robotic model helps study stent performance in a controlled way since patient trials are limited.

soft roboticsesophagusendoprosthetic stentdysphagiaradial forceperistalsismanometryswallowing efficacystent migrationintra-bolus pressure
Authors
Dipankar Bhattacharya, Sherine Jesna V. A., Leo K. Cheng, Weiliang Xu
Abstract
Soft robotic systems are well suited for developing devices for biomedical applications. A bio-mimicking robotic soft esophagus (RoSE) is developed as an in vitro testing device of endoprosthetic stents for dysphagia management. Endoprosthetic stent placement is an immediate and cost-effective therapy for dysphagia caused by malignant esophageal strictures from esophageal cancer. However, later stage complications, like stent migration, could weaken swallow efficacy in the esophagus. The stent radial force (RF) on the esophageal wall is pivotal in avoiding stent migration. Due to limited randomized controlled trials in patients, stent design and stenting guidelines remain incomplete. To address this knowledge deficit, we investigate RoSE by implanting two stents (A and B) of different radial stiffness characteristics, to measure stent RF and its effect on migration. Endoscopic manometry under peristalsis is also performed to study the impact of stenting and stent dysfunction on intra-bolus pressure signatures (IBPSs) and swallowing efficacy. Each implanted stent undergoes experiments with varied peristalsis velocity, wavelength, and bolus concentrations. The results show that stiffer stent B has a higher RF, whereas stent A maintains a lower RF profile due to lesser stiffness. High RF is necessary to minimize migration under prolonged peristaltic contractions in RoSE. For manometry, stent A slightly increases IBPS, but stiffer stent B significantly decreases IBPS, especially for higher-concentration boluses. If a stiffer stent buckles, it can reduce swallow efficacy and cause recurrent dysphagia. RoSE is therefore an innovative soft robotic platform for testing endoprosthetic stents and addressing clinical challenges in stent evaluation.