CARA: Concept-Aware Risk Attention for Interpretable Collision Anticipation
2026-07-24 • Multimedia
MultimediaComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
AI summaryⓘ
The authors created CARA, a new system for self-driving cars to predict collisions early and explain what risks it is tracking over time. CARA uses meaningful risk concepts from accident stories and connects them to video frames, showing how risks change as the car moves. Unlike older systems that are confusing or only work on static images, CARA’s clear risk factors help it focus on important parts of the video and make better predictions. Tests show CARA predicts collisions earlier and more accurately while providing clear reasons for its warnings.
collision anticipationautonomous drivingspatio-temporal frameworkconcept-based methodsvision-language similarityrisk factorsspatial attentiontemporal attentionpredictive modelinginterpretability
Authors
Zhishan Tao, Ruoyu Wang, Yucheng Wu, Enjun Du, Yilei Yuan, Sherwin Ho, Yue Su, Jinbo Su, Yi Hong
Abstract
Collision anticipation in autonomous driving requires not only accurate early warnings but also interpretable reasoning about what risk factors are being tracked and how risk evolves over time. Existing methods fall short in this regard: feature-driven models are opaque, post-hoc explanations often lack fidelity, and concept-based methods are mostly designed for static recognition rather than dynamic driving scenes. We propose CARA (Concept-Aware Risk Attention), an intrinsically interpretable spatio-temporal framework for collision anticipation. CARA derives domain-grounded risk concepts from accident narratives, aligns them with video frames via vision-language similarity, and organizes them into evolving concept trajectories. These trajectories provide explicit risk evidence that guides spatial attention, temporal attention, and anticipation, allowing semantic concepts to directly influence both where the model attends and how it predicts risk over time. By treating semantic risk factors as dynamic intermediate evidence rather than auxiliary post-hoc explanations, CARA tightly couples interpretability with the predictive process. Extensive experiments on three benchmarks show that CARA consistently improves anticipation accuracy and warning earliness over strong baselines, while providing sparse and semantically grounded concept evidence.