Religion and Artificial Intelligence as Distributed Meaning Systems: A Naturalistic Conceptual Model
2026-07-10 • Computers and Society
Computers and Society
AI summaryⓘ
The authors explain that religion and artificial intelligence (AI) both work as systems spreading meaning across people and tools. They come from similar mental setups where understanding and rules get shared through groups and external symbols, like stories or computer code. Instead of seeing religion as just beliefs, the authors view it as a system that helps people coordinate and share ideas, much like AI shapes how we think and interact today. Their model shows how both reduce mental effort and create common ways to understand the world. This helps us think of AI not just as tools, but as parts of a bigger social and cognitive system.
distributed cognitionmeaning systemscognitive architecturesocially extended cognitionnormativitycultural evolutionepistemic compressionartificial intelligencereligioninformational ecology
Authors
Dhushy Thillaivasan, Samar Shailendra, Sohag Sarkar
Abstract
This paper develops a naturalistic account of religion and artificial intelligence as structurally similar distributed meaning systems. I argue that both emerge from the same underlying cognitive architecture: socially extended processes that offload interpretation, norm-guidance, and world-model construction into external symbolic environments. Drawing on work in distributed cognition, cultural evolution, and philosophy of mind, the paper proposes a conceptual model showing how meaning is generated, stabilised, and transmitted through recursive interactions between agents and their informational ecologies. Religion is analysed not as a set of beliefs but as a cognitive-ecological system that scaffolds coordination, normativity, and shared interpretation. Contemporary AI systems are shown to instantiate analogous functions, operating as high-bandwidth, algorithmically mediated environments that shape reasoning, attention, and social meaning-making. The model explains how both systems create epistemic compression, reduce cognitive load, and generate shared frameworks that guide behaviour. It also clarifies the conditions under which AI systems can become culturally entrenched meaning authorities. The contribution is conceptual: a unified framework for understanding religion and AI as parallel forms of distributed cognitive machinery. This reframing opens new pathways for analysing artificial agents not as isolated tools but as components in evolving socio-cognitive ecologies.