2D or 3D: Who Governs Salience in VLA Models? -- Tri-Stage Token Pruning Framework with Modality Salience Awareness

2026-04-10Multimedia

MultimediaComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionRobotics
AI summary

The authors looked at models that understand both pictures and 3D data to help robots or AI better perceive their surroundings. These models use lots of visual information, which makes them slower to work with. The authors found that current methods for speeding them up don’t consider the different importance of 2D and 3D information. They created a new three-step way to smartly choose which data to keep and which to skip, making the models run faster without losing much accuracy.

Vision-Language-Action models2D and 3D modalitiesmulti-visual-modal modelstoken pruninginference speedupmodal salienceembodied intelligencemulti-modal data integrationefficiency optimization
Authors
Zihao Zheng, Sicheng Tian, Zhihao Mao, Lingyue Zhang, Chenyue Li, Ziyun Zhang, Hong Gao, Yuchen Huang, Yutong Xu, Guojie Luo, Xiang Chen
Abstract
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have emerged as the mainstream of embodied intelligence. Recent VLA models have expanded their input modalities from 2D-only to 2D+3D paradigms, forming multi-visual-modal VLA (MVLA) models. Despite achieving improved spatial perception, MVLA faces a greater acceleration demand due to the increased number of input tokens caused by modal expansion. Token pruning is an effective optimization methods tailored to MVLA models. However, existing token pruning schemes are designed for 2D-only VLA models, ignoring 2D/3D modality salience differences. In this paper, we follow the application process of multi-modal data in MVLA models and develop a tri-stage analysis to capture the discrepancy and dynamics of 2D/3D modality salience. Based on these, we propose a corresponding tri-stage token pruning framework for MVLA models to achieve optimal 2D/3D token selection and efficient pruning. Experiments show that our framework achieves up to a 2.55x inference speedup with minimal accuracy loss, while only costing 5.8% overhead. Our Code is coming soon.