Neural-Symbolic Knowledge Tracing: Injecting Educational Knowledge into Deep Learning for Responsible Learner Modelling
2026-04-09 • Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
AI summaryⓘ
The authors studied how to make AI tutors better at understanding what students know as they learn over time. They created a new method called Responsible-DKT, which combines AI models with clear rules from education to track student knowledge more accurately and fairly. Their approach not only predicts student progress better than other methods but also explains its reasoning in an easy-to-understand way. This helps teachers trust the AI and adjust teaching based on clear insights, especially when students make repeated mistakes.
Artificial IntelligenceLarge Language ModelsIntelligent Tutoring SystemsDeep Knowledge TracingNeural-Symbolic ModelsLearner ModellingPredictive PerformanceInterpretabilityAUC (Area Under Curve)Pedagogical Principles
Authors
Danial Hooshyar, Gustav Šír, Yeongwook Yang, Tommi Kärkkäinen, Raija Hämäläinen, Ekaterina Krivich, Mutlu Cukurova, Dragan Gašević, Roger Azevedo
Abstract
The growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, particularly large language models (LLMs), has increased interest in intelligent tutoring systems. However, LLMs often show limited adaptivity and struggle to model learners' evolving knowledge over time, highlighting the need for dedicated learner modelling approaches. Although deep knowledge tracing methods achieve strong predictive performance, their opacity and susceptibility to bias can limit alignment with pedagogical principles. To address this, we propose Responsible-DKT, a neural-symbolic deep knowledge tracing approach that integrates symbolic educational knowledge (e.g., mastery and non-mastery rules) into sequential neural models for responsible learner modelling. Experiments on a real-world dataset of students' math interactions show that Responsible-DKT outperforms both a neural-symbolic baseline and a fully data-driven PyTorch DKT model across training settings. The model achieves over 0.80 AUC with only 10% of training data and up to 0.90 AUC, improving performance by up to 13%. It also demonstrates improved temporal reliability, producing lower early- and mid-sequence prediction errors and the lowest prediction inconsistency rates across sequence lengths, indicating that prediction updates remain directionally aligned with observed student responses over time. Furthermore, the neural-symbolic approach offers intrinsic interpretability via a grounded computation graph that exposes the logic behind each prediction, enabling both local and global explanations. It also allows empirical evaluation of pedagogical assumptions, revealing that repeated incorrect responses (non-mastery) strongly influence prediction updates. These results indicate that neural-symbolic approaches enhance both performance and interpretability, mitigate data limitations, and support more responsible, human-centered AI in education.